公平原則-解放軍文職人員招聘-軍隊(duì)文職考試-紅師教育

發(fā)布時(shí)間:2017-08-10 19:48:40*三、公平原則*(一)概念:民事主體應(yīng)依據(jù)社會(huì)公認(rèn)的公平觀念從事活動(dòng),以維持當(dāng)事人之間的利益均衡。*(二)含義*1、民法在規(guī)范民事主體的權(quán)利、義務(wù)與責(zé)任的承擔(dān)上,體現(xiàn)公平原則,兼顧各方當(dāng)事人的利益。*2、民事活動(dòng)中,依公平原則確定各方具體的權(quán)利義務(wù)。*(三)立法體現(xiàn)*民法通則第4條,其中的等價(jià)有償也是公平原則的一個(gè)體現(xiàn)。*顯失公平制度*四、誠(chéng)實(shí)信用原則*(一)概念:指民事主體進(jìn)行民事活動(dòng)時(shí)必須誠(chéng)實(shí)、善意,信守承諾。*(二)地位:*1、誠(chéng)信原則常被奉為民法中的 帝王條款 ,有君臨民法全域的效力。*2、另一方面,該原則具有填補(bǔ)法律漏洞的功能。*3、近代以來(lái),從此原則又衍生出一個(gè)新的原則即:權(quán)利不得濫用原則。*(三)立法體現(xiàn)*民法通則第4條*五、合法權(quán)益受法律保護(hù)原則*民法通則第5條規(guī)定: 公民、法人的合法的民事權(quán)益受法律保護(hù),任何組織和個(gè)人不得侵犯。*此處之權(quán)益包括兩部分: 權(quán) 、 益 。*權(quán)利:在利益之上設(shè)定了當(dāng)事人得自己實(shí)現(xiàn)其利益內(nèi)容的手段。*法益:雖未在其上賦予法律上的實(shí)現(xiàn)手段,但法律應(yīng)予以保護(hù)的那些利益。*六、守法原則*(一)基本理解:守法原則的核心是:民事主體的民事活動(dòng)應(yīng)當(dāng)遵守法律和行政法規(guī)。*須注意的是,這里所指的守法對(duì)象并非指民法中的任意性規(guī)范和倡導(dǎo)性規(guī)范,而是指遵守法律行政法規(guī)中的強(qiáng)行性規(guī)范。*(二)立法體現(xiàn)*民法通則第6條。* 民事活動(dòng)必須遵守法律,法律沒有規(guī)定的,應(yīng)當(dāng)遵守國(guó)家政策。*七、公序良俗原則*民事活動(dòng)應(yīng)當(dāng)尊重社會(huì)公德,不得損害社會(huì)公共利益,[破壞國(guó)家經(jīng)濟(jì)計(jì)劃](已據(jù)2009.8.27全國(guó)人大常委會(huì)10次會(huì)議決定刪除),擾亂社會(huì)經(jīng)濟(jì)秩序。*公序:指國(guó)家社會(huì)的存在及其發(fā)展所必需的一般秩序。公序更多的是從客觀角度而言,是指由眾多的客觀存在的有形的具體制度構(gòu)建起來(lái)的秩序。*良俗:一般認(rèn)為系指為社會(huì)、國(guó)家的存在和發(fā)展所必要的一般道德,是特定社會(huì)所尊重的最起碼的倫理要求。良俗更多的是從主觀角度上而言,是指一社會(huì)存在的善良風(fēng)俗。*應(yīng)指出,因各國(guó)民事立法指導(dǎo)思想不同,國(guó)情不同,社會(huì)觀念的差別,公序良俗的內(nèi)容也有所不同。

解放軍文職招聘考試公平的分配-解放軍文職人員招聘-軍隊(duì)文職考試-紅師教育

發(fā)布時(shí)間:2017-06-28 16:13:23一個(gè)炎熱的下午,兩個(gè)農(nóng)民在一棵大樹下乘涼。其中一個(gè)叫拉姆,另一個(gè)叫希亞。兩個(gè)人都帶著美味的面包充當(dāng)午飯。拉姆帶了3個(gè)面包,希亞帶了5個(gè)。正當(dāng)他們準(zhǔn)備吃午飯的時(shí)候,一個(gè)商人路過此地。下午好,兩位先生。 商人向拉姆和希亞問候道。商人看起來(lái)又累又餓,所以拉姆和希亞邀請(qǐng)他和他們一起吃午飯。但是我們有三個(gè)人怎么分這三個(gè)面包呢? 拉姆為難了。我們把面包放在一起,再把每個(gè)面包切成均等的三塊。 希亞建議道。把面包切開后,他們把面包平均分成三份,每個(gè)人都不多也不少。吃完面包后,商人堅(jiān)持要給他們錢。拉姆和希亞推辭不掉,只好收下。待商人離開后,兩人一數(shù)金幣的數(shù)量 8個(gè)。8個(gè)金幣,兩個(gè)人。我們就每人4個(gè)金幣。 拉姆說(shuō)道。這不公平。 西亞大聲反對(duì), 我有5個(gè)面包,你只有3個(gè)。所以我應(yīng)該拿5個(gè)金幣,你只能拿3個(gè)。拉姆不想爭(zhēng)吵,但他也不想給希亞5個(gè)金幣。我們?nèi)フ掖彘L(zhǎng)做裁決。他是個(gè)公正的人。 拉姆說(shuō)道。他們來(lái)到村長(zhǎng)毛爾維的家,把整個(gè)事情的經(jīng)過告訴了他。毛爾維想了很久,最后說(shuō): 分配這筆錢的公平辦法就是希亞拿7個(gè)金幣,拉姆拿1個(gè)。什么? 拉姆驚叫道。我為什么該得7個(gè)? 希亞也覺得很奇怪。當(dāng)毛爾維把他的分配理由解釋清楚后,拉姆和希亞打偶沒有對(duì)這個(gè)分配再提出異議。這真的是一個(gè)公平的裁決嗎?要知道毛爾維的裁決是否公平,就要先回答這些問題:1、8個(gè)面包被切成了多少塊?2、每個(gè)人吃了多少塊面包?3、拉姆的面包被分成了多少塊?4、拉姆吃了8塊面包,還剩幾塊留給商人?5、希亞的面包被分成了多上塊?6、希亞吃了8塊面包,還剩幾塊留給商人?毛爾維決定只給拉姆一個(gè)硬幣,而給希亞7個(gè),是因?yàn)樯倘顺粤?塊面包,只有一塊是從拉姆的面包中來(lái)的,而其余7塊都是希亞的。點(diǎn)示:我們憤憤不平,太多是因?yàn)槲覀冎粫?huì)算計(jì),不會(huì)計(jì)算。Just AllocationIn a hot afternoon, two farmers were enjoying the cool under the tree. One farmer called L and the other called X. both carried tasty bread as their lunch. Ltook three bread and X five. A businessman passed by when they were ready to have lunch.good afternoon, gentlemen. The businessman greeted L and X. the businessman was tires and hungry. L and X invited him to have dinner together.But we three men how to separate three breads? L confused.Let s put the breads together, then divide every one into three equal parts. X suggested.Cutting and dividing the breads, they all got the exact one.Eating up the breads, the businessman insisted to pay and L and X have no idea but to get it.When the businessman went away, L and X counted the number of golden bills----eight.Eight bills, two person. Four bills every one. L said.It s unjust, X opposed loudly, I had five breads and you just three, so I should get five bills and you three.L reluctant to argue, neither would he gave X five bills.Let s invite our village manager Morwey s house and tell all to him. Thinking for a while, Morwey replied: The just way to distribute these bill is X take seven bills and L one.Pardon? L screamed.Why should I posses seven? Xalso felt strange.After Morwey explained his reason clearly, both Land X had no dispute on this allocation.Was this really a just rule?Answer these questions before you decide whether it was just or not:1.How many small pieces the eight breads were divided into?2.How many pieces every one ate?3.How many small pieces did L s breads?4.How many pieces L left for the businessman after he ate eight?5.How many small pieces did X s breads were divided into?6.How many pieces X left for the businessman after he ate eight?The reason that Morwey only gave L one bill and X seven because the businessman ate eight pieces and only one was left from L s while other seven pieces from X.Tips: we always indignant mostly because we are used to scheming, but not counting.